Court adjourns case seeking to stop CJN’s trial
Court adjourns case seeking to stop CJN’s trial
Court adjourns case seeking to stop CJN’s trial
CJN, Justice Walter Onnoghen
Justice Evelyn Maha of the Federal High Court, Abuja has adjourned two separate suits seeking to stop trial in the case of false assets declaration filed against the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Walter Onnoghen, till January 28.

The CJN is facing six counts of false assets declaration filed against him by the Code of Conduct Bureau at the Code of Conduct Tribunal.

The plaintiffs are the Incorporated Trustees of the Centre for Justice and Peace Initiative and the Incorporated Trustees of International Association of Students.

The two plaintiffs had through separate applications on January 14 obtained interim orders directing the parties to maintain the status quo pending the determination of the substantive suits, which was fixed for Thursday for hearing.

The respondents are the CCT chairman, Justice Danladi Umar; the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami; the Inspector General of Police, the National Judicial Council and the Senate President, Bukola Saraki.

When the case filed by the Incorporated Trustees of the Centre for Justice and Peace Initiative was mentioned, the plaintiff’s counsel, R.A. Lawal Rabana,SAN, said the business of the day was to move the motion on notice.

He said all the respondents to the suit, except the Senate President, had been served with the processes and the enrolled order of the court.

He prayed the court for a short adjournment to ensure that the Senate President was served in the interest of justice.

The National Judicial Council was the only respondent that attended the hearing on Thursday.

Dr Garba Tetengi, SAN, who announced appearance for the NJC, confirmed that he had been served the court process.

He said he had no objection to the request for adjournment.

In her ruling, Justice Maha held that the processes served on the respondents were not accompanied with certificates itemising each of the processes served on each of the respondents.

She ordered the plaintiff to regularise the service and ensure that the Senate president was served. She adjourned the matter till January 28 for hearing.

In this article:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *