Controversial Ruling: Kano A’Court insists on validity of verdict, blames typographical error
Controversial Ruling: Kano A’Court insists on validity of verdict, blames typographical error

The Chief Registrar of the Court of Appeal, Umar Bangari, has the cleared air on the controversies surrounding the judgement delivered by the court on the Kano Governorship Election dispute.

In a reaction, Bangari said that what happened in the judgement body was a typo error that did not in anyway invalidate or change the findings and conclusion of the court.

The chief registrar assured Nigerians that the error would be rectified once parties in the matter file formal application to that effect.

He cited Order 23 Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal HandBook which empowered the court to correct any clerical error once detected by the court or any of the parties in the matter.

He insisted that contrary to insinuations, the judgment of the court remained valid.

The three-member panel of the appellate court in the majority judgment delivered last Friday, had dismissed the appeal of Governor Yusuf Kabir of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) against the judgment of the Kano State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal for lacking in merit.

However, in the CTC released to lawyers, some contradictions appears to have given verdict in favour of both the appellant and the 1st respondent; the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Mainly, supporters of the appellant and some lawyers are alleging that the judgment was in favour of governor Yusuf Kabir before it was manipulated to favour the APC.

According to them, what the justices read in court was quite different from what is contained in the CTC, adding that the CTC being a written document is the original judgment.

In the CTC dated November 21 and signed by one of the court’s registrar, Ibrahim Umar, the majority judgment delivered by Justice Moore Abraham Adumein had read in part on page 67: I will conclude by stating that the live issues in this appeal are hereby resolved in favour of the 1st respondent and against the appellant.

“In the circumstances, I resolve all the issues in favour of the appellant and against the 1st respondent.

“Thereby I find no merit in this appeal which is liable to be and is hereby dismissed.

“The judgment of the tribunal in Petition No: EPT/KN/GOV/01/2023 between All Progressives Congress (APC) versus Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and 2 others delivered on September 20, 2023 is hereby set aside.

“The sum of N1 million is hereby awarded as cost in favour of the

appellant and against 1st respondent”.

In this article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *