Justice Daniel Osiaigor of the Federal High Court, Lagos, has restrained Integrated Energy Distribution and Marketing Company Ltd and Polaris Bank from tampering with funds standing to their credit totaling $6,759,000 (approximately N2.8 billion) or its equivalent in any currency in 25 banks, the Debt Management Office (DMO) and Federal Ministry of Finance.
The judge, who made the interim order of Mareva Injunction, also held that it would subsist pending the hearing and determination of a motion on notice filed against the firm and Polaris Bank by the United Bank for Africa (UBA).
The court adjourned till July 13, for hearing of the motion. The interim order followed UBA’s June 29 application filed and argued by its counsel, Temilolu Adamolekun, who appeared with Gbenga Akinde-Peters supported by an affidavit sworn to by Anike Isinguzo and exhibits attached.
Integrated Energy Distribution and Marketing Company Ltd and Polaris Bank are the 1st and 2nd respondents in the suit marked FHC/L/CS/714/21.
The 3rd to 26th respondents are Access Bank Plc); (Citibank Nigeria Ltd); (Diamond Bank Plc); (Ecobank Nigeria Ltd); (Enterprise Bank Ltd.); (Fidelity Bank Plc.); (First Bank of Nigeria Plc.); (First City Monument Bank Plc); (Globus Bank Limited); (Guaranty Trust Bank Plc); (Heritage Bank Plc.); (Jaiz Bank Limited), (Keystone Bank Limited); (Polaris Bank Limited); (Providus Bank Limited); (Stanbic IBTC Bank Nigeria Ltd.); (Standard Chartered Bank Ltd.); (Sterling Bank Plc.); (SunTrust Bank Nigeria Limited); (Titan Trust Bank Limited); (Union Bank Plc.); (Unity Bank Plc.); (Wema Bank Plc.) and (Zenith Bank Plc).
The 28th and 29th respondents are the DMO and Finance Ministry. The court further restrained the 3rd to 26th respondents or their agents from releasing the sum to the defendants.
The order also stopped the 1st defendant from dealing with any of the money standing to its credit in all of its accounts, or any money in which it has any interest held on its behalf with the 27th to 29th respondents up to $6,759,000 or its equivalent.
The court restrained the 2nd defendant from dealing with any of the money, instruments, Sovereign Debt Notes, Promissory Notes, Treasury Bills or any other instrument in which it has an interest or standing with the 27th, 28th and 29th respondents, to the tune of $6,759,000 or its equivalent.
It forbade the 27th, 28th and 29th respondents (CBN, DMO and the Federal Ministry of Finance) from releasing any money or funds belonging to the 2nd defendant or wherein the 2nd defendant has an interest up to the $6,759,000 or its equivalent.