The Court of Appeal, Lagos, yesterday set aside the judgement of the Federal High Court, which had exempted the Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas Limited (NLNG) from levies payable to the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) under the NIMASA Act, Cabotage Act, Marine Environment (Sea Protection Levy) Regulations, and other laws.
The court based its ruling on the fact that NIMASA was not given fair hearing at the lower court.
Justice Mohammed Garba, who delivered the judgement, ordered the return of the case to the Federal High Court for fresh trial under a different judge. Today’s ruling restores the status quo, reaffirming NIMASA’s powers to continue to collect the levies.
According to the lead counsel of NIMASA, Mr. Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), the effect of today’s ruling is that the Federal High Court is ordered to revert to the fundamental issue of fair hearing while NLNG continues to pay the statutory levies, pending another ruling by the lower court on the matter.
The dispute between NLNG and NIMASA is based on the refusal by NLNG to pay three per cent of the gross freight on all international outbound and inbound cargo carried by ships chartered by NLNG and its wholly-owned subsidiary company as contained in the NIMASA Act 2007; the refusal by NLNG to pay the two per cent surcharge on cabotage trade undertaken by its vessels within 200 nautical miles of the baselines and Nigerian coastal and inland waters as contained in the Coastal and Inland Shipping (Cabotage) Act 2003; and the refusal by NLNG to comply with the Marine Environment (Sea Protection Levy) Regulations of 2012 and the Merchant Shipping (Ship Generated Marine Waste Reception Facilities) Regulations 2012.
NIMASA had in 2010 commenced action against NLNG, wherein it sought an interpretation of relevant provisions of the Nigerian LNG (Fiscal Incentives, Guarantees and Assurances) Act, CAP N87, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990, and the NIMASA Act of 2007. In January 2013, the action by NIMASA was withdrawn in a bid to amicably settle the dispute out of court.
Following the continued disregard of the provisions of the NIMASA Act and other relevant laws by the NLNG, in May 2013, NIMASA sought to enforce the provisions of the NIMASA Act and Cabotage Act as empowered under the Act, by demanding payment of the charges due from the NLNG, consequent upon which NLNG vessels were detained for non-compliance.
Upon intervention by the Federal Government, through the National Security Adviser (NSA), an agreement in principle was adopted, with NLNG undertaking to pay up all outstanding levies and comply with the requirements of the NIMASA Act 2007, the Cabotage Act 2003 and other relevant Regulations at the time. NLNG paid payment of $20 million and the blockade was lifted.
In this article:
The court based its ruling on the fact that NIMASA was not given fair hearing at the lower court.
Justice Mohammed Garba, who delivered the judgement, ordered the return of the case to the Federal High Court for fresh trial under a different judge. Today’s ruling restores the status quo, reaffirming NIMASA’s powers to continue to collect the levies.
According to the lead counsel of NIMASA, Mr. Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), the effect of today’s ruling is that the Federal High Court is ordered to revert to the fundamental issue of fair hearing while NLNG continues to pay the statutory levies, pending another ruling by the lower court on the matter.
The dispute between NLNG and NIMASA is based on the refusal by NLNG to pay three per cent of the gross freight on all international outbound and inbound cargo carried by ships chartered by NLNG and its wholly-owned subsidiary company as contained in the NIMASA Act 2007; the refusal by NLNG to pay the two per cent surcharge on cabotage trade undertaken by its vessels within 200 nautical miles of the baselines and Nigerian coastal and inland waters as contained in the Coastal and Inland Shipping (Cabotage) Act 2003; and the refusal by NLNG to comply with the Marine Environment (Sea Protection Levy) Regulations of 2012 and the Merchant Shipping (Ship Generated Marine Waste Reception Facilities) Regulations 2012.
NIMASA had in 2010 commenced action against NLNG, wherein it sought an interpretation of relevant provisions of the Nigerian LNG (Fiscal Incentives, Guarantees and Assurances) Act, CAP N87, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990, and the NIMASA Act of 2007. In January 2013, the action by NIMASA was withdrawn in a bid to amicably settle the dispute out of court.
Following the continued disregard of the provisions of the NIMASA Act and other relevant laws by the NLNG, in May 2013, NIMASA sought to enforce the provisions of the NIMASA Act and Cabotage Act as empowered under the Act, by demanding payment of the charges due from the NLNG, consequent upon which NLNG vessels were detained for non-compliance.
Upon intervention by the Federal Government, through the National Security Adviser (NSA), an agreement in principle was adopted, with NLNG undertaking to pay up all outstanding levies and comply with the requirements of the NIMASA Act 2007, the Cabotage Act 2003 and other relevant Regulations at the time. NLNG paid payment of $20 million and the blockade was lifted.
In this article: